<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Canon Canonet G-III QL17 Camera Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scottlocklear.com/canon-canonet-giii-ql17-camera-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scottlocklear.com/canon-canonet-giii-ql17-camera-review/</link>
	<description>documentary and editorial photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 02:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://scottlocklear.com/canon-canonet-giii-ql17-camera-review/#comment-36</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2023 22:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scottlocklear.com/?p=1698#comment-36</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lens on mine is nice, but only over f/2.8, so Leica quality it ain&#039;t. Also, the camera locks up if the metered exposure is out of range, which for me has been a problem more often than I&#039;d like. I&#039;d much rather get an under/overexposed shot than none at all. Not a problem in manual mode, but the fiddly controls don&#039;t make that a great experience. That said, despite the limitations, I&#039;ve got plenty of decent photos out of mine. Better street photography machine than a phone any day of the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lens on mine is nice, but only over f/2.8, so Leica quality it ain&#8217;t. Also, the camera locks up if the metered exposure is out of range, which for me has been a problem more often than I&#8217;d like. I&#8217;d much rather get an under/overexposed shot than none at all. Not a problem in manual mode, but the fiddly controls don&#8217;t make that a great experience. That said, despite the limitations, I&#8217;ve got plenty of decent photos out of mine. Better street photography machine than a phone any day of the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://scottlocklear.com/canon-canonet-giii-ql17-camera-review/#comment-35</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scottlocklear.com/?p=1698#comment-35</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fine review, nice camera but, in spite of all it has, it completely misses the street photography philosophy. Why ? Try expose &quot;the decisive moment&quot; and you`ll see. Triggering the shutter takes ages and if you try to &quot;hurry&quot; it, 99% chances are to shake the camera and mess everything. The Olympus XA 1 marvel comes in mind but for my coffee addicted fingers it is way too sensitive so, a battered Barnack Leica or even a tuned Zorky (first serial) is far better at that. Both lack automated exposure but real street photographers always &quot;know&quot; the right exposure... Anyway, the Canonet`s meter with a CdS is not only awkward to use but way too slow in picking the right exposure. Nothing to say about the 5 blades (5 !) diaphragm of the otherwise good glass... So, sorry Canon but for street (silver) photography, while dreaming of a Konica Hexar AF,  I`d pick a Leica II-III, a Minolta CL (with dead meter...) or even a battered Zorki / FED... Decisive moments are fot them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine review, nice camera but, in spite of all it has, it completely misses the street photography philosophy. Why ? Try expose &#8220;the decisive moment&#8221; and you`ll see. Triggering the shutter takes ages and if you try to &#8220;hurry&#8221; it, 99% chances are to shake the camera and mess everything. The Olympus XA 1 marvel comes in mind but for my coffee addicted fingers it is way too sensitive so, a battered Barnack Leica or even a tuned Zorky (first serial) is far better at that. Both lack automated exposure but real street photographers always &#8220;know&#8221; the right exposure&#8230; Anyway, the Canonet`s meter with a CdS is not only awkward to use but way too slow in picking the right exposure. Nothing to say about the 5 blades (5 !) diaphragm of the otherwise good glass&#8230; So, sorry Canon but for street (silver) photography, while dreaming of a Konica Hexar AF,  I`d pick a Leica II-III, a Minolta CL (with dead meter&#8230;) or even a battered Zorki / FED&#8230; Decisive moments are fot them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
